In 1994, up to one million people were killed in Rwanda in about one hundred days. Afterwards, more than 100,000 suspects sat in prisons built for a fraction of that number. At the normal pace of the courts, trying them all could have taken generations.
Rwanda chose a path from its own tradition. From 2005 to 2012, more than 12,000 community courts called gacaca — meaning "grass", where neighbours meet to settle disputes — heard more than 1.2 million cases. Survivors learned what happened to their families. Perpetrators confessed in front of their communities. A National Unity and Reconciliation Commission, founded in 1999, carried the work further.
The process was not perfect. Human Rights Watch documented weak legal safeguards and unfair trials in some cases, and critics note limits on political freedom today. Honesty about these limits is part of learning from Rwanda, not a reason to ignore it.
For Somalia and other societies divided by clan or conflict, the question is not whether to copy Rwanda, but what our own gacaca could be.
What would a local, community-led truth process look like where you come from? Who would people trust to lead it?
Sources: United Nations, The Justice and Reconciliation Process in Rwanda (2014); Human Rights Watch, Justice Compromised (2011).